Blog

Luis Majano

March 09, 2011

Spread the word


Share your thoughts

A few folks have asked how you can leverage MXUnit and MockBox to mock a super class class.  Here is a simple example to showcase this:

Class Parent A

<cfcomponent name="A"> 
<!--- send ---> 
<cffunction access="public" hint="" name="send" output="false" returntype="any"> 
<cfreturn parent="">
</cffunction> 
</cfcomponent> 

Class Parent B

<cfcomponent extends="A" name="B"> 
	<!--- send ---> 
	<cffunction access="public" hint="" name="send" output="false" returntype="any"> 
		<cfargument default="" hint="" name="name" required="true" type="string"> 
		<cfif arguments.name neq ""> 
			<cfreturn name="arguments.name"> 
		<cfelse> 
			<cfreturn>
		</cfif> 
	</cffunction> 
</cfcomponent>

Here is our test case, please note that we use the coldbox package for simplicity, if you are using mockbox standalone, then just follow the docs.

<cfcomponent extends="coldbox.system.testing.BaseTestCase">
<cfscript> 
function setup(){ 
    // create and prepare for mocking. 
    b = getMockBox().prepareMock( createObject("component","B") ); 
} 

function testSend(){ 
    // create a virtual super scope and mock a send method on it 
    mockSuper = getMockBox().createStub().$("send","Mocked Super"); 
    
    // inject the mock super into the variables scope 
    b.$property("super","variables", mockSuper); 
    
    // send method call 
    r = b.send(); 
    
    // use simple mxunit debug to show results. 
    debug(r); 
} 
</cfscript>
</cfcomponent>

So as you can see, the super scope is just another reference in the variables scope, so I can easily create a MockBox stub and mock away. You can also be more concise if you want to leave the methods intact in the super scope by creating a mock of the parent class:

getMockBox().createMock("A").$("send","Mocked Super");

 

Add Your Comment

(2)

Mar 10, 2011 09:03:09 UTC

by Chris Tierney

Thanks Luis for this great write up! What is you opinion on mocking a super class? Should it be mocked as the example provides or should it generally be treated as an all-in-one?

May 14, 2013 12:43:43 UTC

by duncan

Thanks for this useful post. It's a shame the blog has screwed up the layout of the code block. Also the date of the post is reading as 1111 for the year

Recent Entries

Partner with BoxLang and Ortus at Into the Box 2025: Empowering the Future of Modern Software Development!

Partner with BoxLang and Ortus at Into the Box 2025: Empowering the Future of Modern Software Development!

At Ortus Solutions, we’ve always been at the forefront of innovation in the ColdFusion ecosystem. From pioneering modern ColdFusion practices to developing cutting-edge tools and frameworks, we’ve been passionate to help and sup[port the community into shaping the future of web development.That’s why we decided to build BoxLang, our new JVM programming language that not only builds on the strengths of ColdFusion but takes modern software development to the next level.

Maria Jose Herrera
Maria Jose Herrera
December 23, 2024
Why BoxLang When You Have Kotlin, Groovy, Scala, and more…

Why BoxLang When You Have Kotlin, Groovy, Scala, and more…

As we approach a stable release of BoxLang and our continued marketing reaches more folks, many have asked about its purpose. Why create a new language when the JVM ecosystem already includes established languages like Kotlin, Groovy, and Scala, to name a few.

Luis Majano
Luis Majano
December 18, 2024